Assertiveness and Direct Communication: Your Wording is a Critical Productivity Tool
One of the factors that sets human
beings apart from the rest of
Creation—that has, in fact, helped
make us the dominant species on this
planet—is our ability to communicate
in great detail, with a minimum of
confusion and unproductive "noise."
That said, it's amazing how easy it
is to fail to communicate properly.
The annals of history are replete
with episodes of poor communication
(or a complete lack thereof) that
led to widespread misery and pain.
On a lesser scale, individuals and
businesses have to deal with
miscommunication issues every single
day; and in the workplace, such
issues can have a severe impact not
just on individual productivity, but
on the overall bottom line.
Even when the lines of communication
are wide open, you can fail to
communicate if you use the wrong
words in the wrong way, or simply
use too many words. Beating around
the bush, couching your message in
obscure terms, or burying it in a
mass of unnecessary verbiage may
cause mental static in the people
you're trying to communicate with,
resulting in confusion and
irritation. At best, this will slow
them down; at worst, they may ignore
you altogether. Either outcome will
damage productivity, both yours and
theirs.
Therefore, whether you're
communicating with employees or
superiors, you have to make every
effort to get your point across with
a minimum of noise. It's crucial to
choose your words with great care,
so that you can say precisely what
you mean as directly as you can
without being curt or offensive.
Let's look at several ways to
accomplish that.
Get Straight to the Point
Have you ever tried to discuss
something with someone who rambled,
refused to be pinned down, or liked
to dance around the subject? If you
have, then you know how annoying it
can be—and how non-productive. Maybe
the speaker was afraid you'd be
angry or upset if he came right out
and said what he had to say; maybe
he simply wanted attention; or maybe
he just liked to listen to himself
speak.
The reason why doesn't matter. It
doesn't even matter if the person
was amusing or instructive to listen
to, as some ramblers are. What
matters is that they wasted your
time, and theirs, by not getting
straight to the point. You don't
want to do this to other people, so
your communications, especially your
written ones, should be brief and
concise.
Some people avoid terseness because
they don't want to seem rude; and
admittedly, verbal interaction is
often necessary, or at least useful,
in the workplace as a form of social
lubrication. There's no doubt that
politeness pays, and that you should
do your best to stay in your
co-workers' good graces by being
genuinely nice. Nonetheless, in most
workplace situations there's no
excuse not to get right to
the point. You can smile when you do
it; this should take the edge off
for those who are easily offended.
If being straightforward is a
problem for you, practice what you
want to say in advance. Take a
results-oriented stance, envisioning
exactly what you're trying to
achieve. Then edit your message
toward that end (mentally in the
case of verbal communication,
literally in the case of written
words) to make it plain and
specific. Tweak your message as
necessary to avoid sounding brusque,
then deliver it assertively, as
simply as possible.
Avoid Unnecessary Qualifiers and
Hedging
Some people just can't seem to
deliver any message, especially a
request, firmly and directly. They
hem in everything they say with so
many qualifiers—"what if’s,"
"maybe’s," and "could be’s"—that
ultimately, what they're trying to
say gets lost, causing the
recipients to waste time on
interpretation and clarification.
In other cases, the bad communicator
hedges the message with terms that
make it seem less important than it
might actually be. Instead of simply
telling the IT Department that they
need a certain backup file right
away, for example, they might say
something like, "Um, if you have a
chance, could you pull this file for
me? No hurry." This gives the
recipient the opportunity to ignore
the request or push it down the
priority scale if they want, no
matter that it's urgent to the
sender...because that hasn't been
made clear.
There's a word for this kind of poor
communication: "mealy-mouthed," from
the old German slang term for an
inability to communicate directly.
It's often used in a contemptuous
way for someone who's unwilling to
state a personal opinion, or come
down one way or another on an issue.
This might play in the social and
political rings, but it's painful
and unproductive in the business
arena.
Some people hedge and qualify out of
habit, often because they simply
don't want to commit themselves to a
specific point or course of action.
Other people are mealy-mouthed from
the best of intentions, because they
don't want to bother or irritate
someone, or because they want to
soften the blow of a potentially
controversial or loaded
statement...but you know what road
those good intentions pave.
Some qualification is unavoidable,
especially when the information
you're imparting is based upon the
actions of people you have no
control over, or the situation is
simply uncertain. But again, you can
avoid the worst of the problem by
delivering your communications
assertively and as simply as
possible, without unnecessary
frills. Avoiding uncertainty or
hesitation. Use the active tense
rather than passive: say things
like, "I need this file..." rather
than "This file is needed...",
because it sounds more direct and
imperative.
Diffidence or timidity will only
hold you back, so say precisely what
you mean. If someone asks you a
question, give them the specific
information they've requested. You
can be helpful and add additional
information if you think it's
relevant, but don't waste their time
with stuff they clearly don't need.
If you're asking for information or
imparting instructions, be
imperative in your delivery. Never
tell someone to get you something
"if you get the chance," or "when
you can." You need to take charge
and make your requirements
absolutely clear. Speaking of
which...
Make Your Requests and
Requirements Plain
The bottom line with workplace
communication is that it must be as
simple and unambiguous as humanly
possible...and there’s the problem.
It's easy to advise someone to say
only what needs to be said, but it's
not always obvious how much that
needs to be.
It's possible to be too terse in an
attempt to be clear and direct. If
you tell someone, "I need
information on the Jones account,"
that's direct, all right; but you're
being too vague, because you haven't
asked for enough. Which Jones
account do you mean? If there are
two or three Jones with different
first names, you're already tripping
over the speed bump of uncertainty.
Furthermore, what information do you
need? Everything in the whole file,
or just this year's financials? And
when do you need it—within the next
hour, by the close of business, or
sometime in the next week?
So don't hesitate to explain as much
as you need to in order to be fully
understood, especially in terms of
deadlines and deliverables required.
Just don't dump so much information
on the listener that they can't
understand what you're trying to
say. This can be a difficult
judgment call, and again,
pre-editing is crucial here. Examine
your message closely. If all they
really need to know is in the final
line of the message, then cut
everything else and just use that
final line.
It's also important to use the right
words to get the point across. If
what you're trying to say doesn't
seem quite on the mark, then spend
some time refining it, because
that's likely to pay off in
dividends of greater comprehension.
As Mark Twain once pointed out, "The
difference between the right word
and the almost right word is the
difference between lightning and
lightning-bug."
In general, your language should be
simple and easy to understand. Don't
address someone like they're a
third-grader, but on the other hand,
don't use fancy words just because
you can—and avoid overusing jargon
when it's unnecessary. Before you
refer to something by an acronym or
an abbreviation, be sure that it's a
shared term. For example: it won't
help to ask a new intern to get you
the RFP for the DFW DCH account ASAP
if they don't know that an RFP is a
Request for Proposal, and DFW DCH is
shorthand for the Dallas/Fort Worth
branch of the Dalquist, Culpepper,
and Harrison law firm.
Acknowledgement in All Directions
In the military, someone who
receives a verbal order is often
required to repeat it back
immediately to acknowledge that they
received it. This is especially true
in the Navy. It's standard operating
procedure for a simple reason: if a
message is poorly relayed and the
wrong action taken, the results can
be disastrous.
Your personal miscommunications may
not have devastating results, but
they can certainly damage
productivity. Therefore,
acknowledgement of those
communications is absolutely
essential. When you receive a
message from someone, whether
they're above or below you in the
chain of command, acknowledge it as
quickly as possible. (For superiors,
I would recommend that you do so
immediately).
Similarly, request an
acknowledgement from anyone you send
a message to; and if they don't
respond, be proactive about
acquiring that acknowledgement. No
need to be impolite, just assertive
and persistent. Send them a nudge by
email or pick up the phone and say,
"Hey, I sent you a message about
such-and-such yesterday. Did you get
it?" It's possible they didn't.
Maybe it passed under their radar
somehow, or the technology you sent
it by just happened to fail you in
this instance. This happens
occasionally, as all of us can
attest.
You can't let anyone use the claim
that they didn't get a message as an
excuse for not getting something
done. Get an acknowledgement—not
just so you can cover yourself
later, but so you can make sure that
they understand what you need and
require, and so that you know that
they comprehend the urgency of your
request.
In a related vein, make it
abundantly clear that anyone you
send a message to is free to ask
questions if they don't understand
what you're trying to say. Encourage
them to do so, and be patient when
they do, so their lack of
understanding doesn't result in
unproductive errors. The same goes
for you: if you don't understand
exactly what your interlocutor
wants, keep asking questions until
you do—even in the face of their
irritation and rudeness, if it comes
to that. It's more productive to go
back and forth a few times than to
find out later that the wrong thing
got done because of a
miscommunication.
The Final Word
When you communicate directly with
anyone in the workplace, your
phrasing and delivery must be as
clear as possible in order to
maximize productivity. Be assertive,
plain, and straightforward. Never
hem and haw. Don't use a ten-dollar
word when a nickel word will do and
avoid jargon when you can. Finally,
immediately acknowledge any
communications you receive, and
strongly encourage acknowledgement
from those you communicate with;
require such acknowledgement if
possible. Make it clear that others
can ask questions in order to
clarify your wants and needs, and be
willing to ask such questions
yourself.
While there will always be some
potential for confusion in human
interaction (we are only human,
after all), solid, clear
communication at all levels will
ensure that such confusion is
minimized. If you follow these
simple rules, not only will people
not have to waste time (and
therefore productivity) trying to
figure out what you're trying to
say, they're less likely to
mistake what you're trying to
say. Mistakes waste time, and time
really is money—so it's crucial to
avoid as many miscommunications as
possible.
Make it a productive day!
(TM)
If you enjoyed this article, you can register for the August 30, 2011 webinar on exactly how to do this! http://www.theproductivitypro.com/2011webinars.
(C) Copyright 2011 Laura Stack. All rights reserved.
© 2011 Laura Stack. Laura Stack is a personal productivity expert, author, and professional speaker whose mission is to build high-performance productivity cultures in organizations by creating Maximum Results in Minimum Time®. She is the president of The Productivity Pro®, Inc., a time management training firm specializing in productivity improvement in high-stress organizations and the 2011-2012 President of the National Speakers Association. Since 1992, Laura has presented keynotes and seminars on improving output, lowering stress, and saving time in today’s workplaces. She is the bestselling author of four books: SUPERCOMPETENT; The Exhaustion Cure; Find More Time; and Leave the Office Earlier. Laura has been a spokesperson for Microsoft, 3M, Xerox, and Office Depot. She is the creator of The Productivity Pro® planner by Day-Timer and has been featured on the CBS Early Show, CNN, and the New York Times. Her clients include Starbucks, Cisco Systems, Wal-Mart, and Bank of America. To have Laura speak at your next event, call 303-471-7401 or visit www.TheProductivityPro.com to sign up for her free monthly productivity newsletter.